Substitutionary Atonement In The Light Of Vicarious Liability

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Patrick Omutia
John M. Kiboi

Abstract

Classical atonement theories can be divided into two major categories: objective and subjective. Objective theories are not well received in contemporary society. The idea of the death of Jesus Christ being substitute to human punishment undermines the principal of morality; one dying in place of another person who does not even know why the other is dying for them is not readily received. In modern society, Christians would prefer to regard Jesus’ action in terms of moral influence. Nonetheless, the Bible teaches the work of Christ as being both objective as well as subjective in nature. Since it is the aspect of one man dying for many (objective) that is problematic to modern moralists, this article argues that by use of vicarious liability; a modern legal concept familiar to modern moralists, the death of Christ as being vicarious could be best understood. The vicarious liability is both subjective as well as objective. Thus, this article argues that the work of Christ should be considered in its entirety. The article makes brief survey of some of the classical, medieval, Reformation and contemporary period atonement theories that attempted to explain the work of Christ as an atonement. In the research, the authors realized that some of those theories cannot find full acceptance today due to change of worldviews. The article applies the principle of analogia entis and nexus mysteriorum and uses contemporary doctrine of vicarious liability, a philosophy that is familiar, as its lumen sub quo in explaining the doctrine of substitutionary theory. The research is both library and field. For field data collection, a non-probability sampling was used.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Omutia, P., & Kiboi, J. M. (2022). Substitutionary Atonement In The Light Of Vicarious Liability. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 7(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.7.2.178

References

  1. A Lion Handbook: The History of Christianity, Oxford England: Lion Publishing PLC, 1977.
  2. Athanasius, S. and Lawson, P. St. Athanasius on the incarnation. The Treatise De Incarnatione Verbi Dei, 1953.
  3. Baddeley, M. and Edwards, M. The nature of the atonement in Athanasius. 3rd ed. England: University of Oxford, 2017.
  4. BBC. ‘Kenyan arrests for ‘witch’ deaths. 22May 2018. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7415502.stm. Accessed on 18th July 2022.
  5. Behr, J. On the Apostolic Preaching. Crestwood, N.Y: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.1997.
  6. Blackwell, Ben C. “Christosis Pauline Soteriology in Light of Deification in Irenaeus and Cyril of Alexandria.” In Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament. Tübingen: Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.
  7. Cairns, D. and Bridge, “Anselm’s ‘Cur Deus Homo’: A Critical Essay”. The Expository Times.
  8. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/001452464005100904.
  9. Calvin, John, The Institutes of The Christian Religion, trans. by Henry Beveridge. Grand Rapids: WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1998.
  10. Du Plessis, JV, Fouche, MA and van Wyk, MW. A Practical Guide to Labour Law (5th ed.).
  11. Durban: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2002.
  12. Kaiser, Denis. “Peter Abelard’s Theology of Atonement: A Multifaceted Approach and Reevaluation.’’ Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 26 (1) 2015:3-28. https://www.atsjats.org/kaiser-abelard-on-atonement-format.pdf. Accessed on 21/07/2022.
  13. Kiboi, John, Michael The Tripartite Office of Christ in the Light of Worgoondet: Towards a Sabaot Christology of Inculturation, Nairobi: CUEA Press, 2017.
  14. Loewe, W.P. 1985 ‘’Irenaeus’ Soteriology: Christus Victor Revisited,’’ Anglican Theological Review Vol 21, 67(1), 1-15.
  15. Morrow, TWJ “Substitution and Representation”, in New Dictionary of Theology. Illinois: Intervasity Press, 1988.
  16. Mueller, J.J. What are they saying about Theological Method? N.Y.: Paulist Press, 1984.
  17. R. van Jaarsveld “Labour Law” in Commercial Law, 2nd Ed. LexisNexis Butterworths, 2000.
  18. St. Irenaeus Against Heresies (n.d.)., III.18.2 https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0103.htm.
  19. Vogel, Jeff. “The Haste of Sin, the Slowness of Salvation: An Interpretation of Irenaeus on the Fall and Redemption.” Anglican theological review. 2007. 89(3), 433-459.