Influence of Resource Allocation on the Performance of Chicken Farming Projects in the Mwala Sub-County, Machakos County

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 11, 2025
https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.2.2.2025.451
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Special Issue - African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research (AMJR) - 2025

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Alex Ndolo
St. Paul's University

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the influence of resource allocation on the performance of chicken farming projects in the Mwala sub-county, Machakos county. This study employed a descriptive research design. The target population was 600 chicken farmers in Mwala Sub-County who are beneficiaries of the Machakos County Government agricultural value chain initiative. A sample of 240 respondents was selected using stratified random sampling to ensure representation across the six wards. Primary data was collected using fully structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed that resource allocation has a positive and significant influence on the performance of chicken farming projects. Respondents generally agreed that their projects operate within set budgets, resources are utilized efficiently with minimal wastage, and usage is closely monitored. While input delivery was mostly timely, occasional delays were noted. A majority of the projects had clear schedules guiding resource allocation, supporting effective planning and operations. It concluded that adherence to budget plans facilitates timely project implementation and financial stability. Efficient use of resources without wastage correlates with higher profitability and expanded production capacity. Timely delivery of inputs supports project continuity, while regular monitoring ensures operations remain on track. Clear resource allocation schedules enhance overall planning and project outcomes. It recommended that chicken farming projects in Mwala Sub-County strengthen adherence to budgetary frameworks to support timely execution and financial discipline. Digital systems that promote efficient resource utilization should be adopted to reduce wastage and increase profitability. Timely procurement and delivery of essential inputs such as feeds and vaccines should be prioritized. In addition, continuous monitoring of resource usage should be emphasized to ensure accountability and sustained project performance.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Ndolo, A. . (2025). Influence of Resource Allocation on the Performance of Chicken Farming Projects in the Mwala Sub-County, Machakos County. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 2(2), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.2.2.2025.451

References

  1. Abeysinghe, S. (2022). Project quality management. In Managing information technology projects: Building a body of knowledge in IT project management (pp. 245–281). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811240584_0010
  2. Abro, Z., Kassie, M., Tanga, C., Beesigamukama, D., & Diiro, G. (2020). Socio-economic and environmental implications of replacing conventional poultry feed with insect-based feed in Kenya. Journal of Cleaner Production, 265, 121871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121871
  3. Adepoju, A. H., Austin-Gabriel, B. L., Eweje, A. D., & Collins, A. N. (2022). Framework for automating multi-team workflows to maximize operational efficiency and minimize redundant data handling. IRE Journals, 5(9), 663–664.
  4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388734627
  5. Ahmad, M. H., & Abd, Z. F. (2022). Optimization of economic resources in raising and fattening poultry fields for the 2020 productive season (Hamdaniya District: A case study). Indian Journal of Ecology, 49, 290–297.
  6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372628844
  7. Ahsun, A., & Elly, B. (2024). Optimizing resource allocation for enhanced project efficiency. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385560767
  8. Anis, F. (2023). Employee engagement in contract broiler farming (CBF) of Kazi Farms Group [Unpublished master's thesis]. United International University. http://dspace.uiu.ac.bd/handle/52243/2840
  9. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  10. Chen, Z. S., Zhou, M. D., Chin, K. S., Darko, A., Wang, X. J., & Pedrycz, W. (2023). Optimized decision support for BIM maturity assessment. Automation in Construction, 149, 104808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104808
  11. Chepng’eno, J., & Kimutai, G. (2021). Planning and resource allocation as project integrated management skills on sustainability of road projects. International Academic Journal of Information Sciences and Project Management, 3(6), 443–460. https://iajournals.org/articles/iajispm_v3_i6_443_460.pdf
  12. Cheruiyot, J. K., Kibett, J. K., Omunyin, M. E., & Kere, G. M. (2025). Exploring the latent roles of indigenous chickens among rural households in Kericho County, Kenya: A grounded theory approach. East African Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajis.8.1.2653
  13. Ebukiba, E., Nurudeen, O. F., Sennuga, S. O., & Omole, A. O. (2023). Profitability and resource-use efficiency of poultry egg production in Kuje Area Council. Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.26765/DRJAFS11234815
  14. Fayemi, P. O., Fayemi, O. E., Joel, L. O., & Ogungbuyi, M. G. (2021). COVID-19 syndrome: Nexus with herbivory and exposure dynamics for monitoring livestock welfare and agro-environment. Sustainability, 13(22), 12381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212381
  15. Fu, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Liu, J., Tang, J., ... & Zhu, F. (2022). Optimization of metabolomic data processing using NOREVA. Nature Protocols, 17(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00636-9
  16. George, A. S., & George, A. H. (2023). Optimizing poultry production through advanced monitoring and control systems. Partners Universal International Innovation Journal, 1(5), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10050352
  17. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
  18. Grillo, H., Alemany, M. M. E., & Caldwell, E. (2022). Human resource allocation problem in the Industry 4.0: A reference framework. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 169, 108110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108110
  19. Gunawardana, M., & Nissanka, S. (2024). An analysis of how different project management methodologies facilitate timely project delivery from a sensemaking perspective. https://hdl.handle.net/2077/82141
  20. Hussein, A., & Abu-Laban, A. (2022). Integration between project management processes and project risk management. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(3), 258–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.21
  21. Ipara, B. O., Otieno, D. J., Nyikal, R., & Makokha, N. S. (2021). The contribution of extensive chicken production systems and practices to Newcastle disease outbreaks in Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02550-w
  22. Jarrah, M. A., Baker, J., & Altarawneh, I. (2022). Toward successful project implementation. [Journal name missing—please supply].
  23. Kathuri, D. N. (2022). Adoption of recommended technologies along banana value chain and its effects on productivity in Embu West Sub-County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Embu). http://repository.embuni.ac.ke/handle/123456789/4086
  24. Kopler, I., Marchaim, U., Tikász, I. E., Opaliński, S., Kokin, E., Mallinger, K., ... & Banhazi, T. (2023). Farmers’ perspectives of the benefits and risks in precision livestock farming in the EU pig and poultry sectors. Animals, 13(18), 2868. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182868
  25. Lusambili, A. M., Nyanja, N., Chabeda, S. V., Temmerman, M., Nyaga, L., Obure, J., & Ngugi, A. (2021). Community health volunteers’ challenges and preferred income-generating activities for sustainability: A qualitative case study of rural Kilifi, Kenya. BMC Health Services Research, 21, Article 615. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06693-w
  26. Machakos County Government. (2024). Machakos County integrated development plan (CIDP) 2023–2027. https://maarifa.cog.go.ke/sites/default/files/2024-06/MACHAKOS%20CIDP%202023-2027.pdf
  27. Macharia, J. K., Ogolah, E. O., & Munyaneza, J. P. (2022). Indigenous chicken farming in Kenya: A mini-review of genetic resource, production systems, constraints, and opportunities. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genomics, 6, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.12972/jabng.20220020
  28. Mathieu, E. M. (2021). Technology adoption, production and market participation among smallholder indigenous chicken farmers in Tigania West Sub-County, Meru County (Doctoral dissertation, University of Embu). http://repository.embuni.ac.ke/handle/embuni/3885
  29. Mathiu, E. M., Ndirangu, S. N., & Mwangi, S. C. (2021). Production of indigenous poultry among smallholder farmers in Tigania West Meru County, Kenya. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 17(5), 705–713. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2021.15465
  30. Mayo-Alvarez, L., Alvarez-Risco, A., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., Sekar, M. C., & Yáñez, J. A. (2022). A systematic review of earned value management methods: An AHP approach. Sustainability, 14(22), 15259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215259
  31. Mbugua, D. (2024). Project monitoring and evaluation and performance of agribusiness projects in Kiambu County, Kenya (Master’s thesis, Kenyatta University). https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/df9dd819-dd6b-49ad-ab1f-5a867cb3f21d
  32. Mohamed, A. M. (2023). Resource management and project execution (Doctoral dissertation, Kampala International University). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12306/14334
  33. Mohamed, M. M. (2024). Factors influencing commercial production of indigenous poultry in Mandera County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, KeMU). http://repository.kemu.ac.ke/handle/123456789/1785
  34. Morad, A. (2023). An analysis of global construction project causes and implications of cost overruns. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/sjyn6
  35. Ndunda, M. M. (2023). Farm-level practices and costs of disease in poultry farms within peri-urban areas of Nairobi, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). https://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/164517
  36. Nielsen, S. S., Alvarez, J., Bicout, D. J., Calistri, P., Canali, E., ... & Winckler, C. (2022). Methodological guidance for the development of animal welfare mandates in the context of the Farm to Fork Strategy. EFSA Journal, 20(7), e07403. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7403
  37. Obi-Nwandikom, C. O., Ehirim, N. C., Anyiam, K. H., Ibeagwa, O. B., & Achukwu, E. C. (2020). Resource-use efficiency of broiler production in Owerri Agricultural Zone of Imo State, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.31248/JASP2020.205
  38. Omondi, S. O. (2022). Poultry value chain in medium-sized cities in Kenya: Insights from cluster theory. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 601299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.601299
  39. Ouabira, M. M., & Fakhravar, H. (2021). Effective project management and the role of quality assurance throughout the project life cycle. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2021.6.5.2345
  40. ReportLinker. (2024). Kenya poultry industry outlook 2024–2028. https://www.reportlinker.com/clp/country/1761/726252
  41. Scheepers, H., McLoughlin, S., & Wijesinghe, R. (2022). Aligning stakeholders’ perceptions of project performance: The contribution of business realisation management. International Journal of Project Management, 40(5), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.03.002
  42. Simonaitis, A., Daukšys, M., & Mockienė, J. (2023). A comparison of the project management methodologies PRINCE2 and PMBOK in managing repetitive construction projects. Buildings, 13(7), 1796. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071796
  43. Syamil, A., Samosir, J. M., & Heriyati, P. (2021). The impact of project performance on customer satisfaction. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 5658–5668.
  44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350798009
  45. Tarawneh, A. (2025). Efficient project management strategies for translation projects: Maximizing quality and timeliness in multilingual content creation. In Artificial intelligence, sustainable technologies, and business innovation: Opportunities and challenges of digital transformation (pp. 755–764). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77925-1_66
  46. Toussaint, E. (2022). Project management plan for the construction of a chicken farm in Lory, Haiti (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad para la Cooperación Internacional). https://www.ucipfg.com/biblioteca/files/original/6e48772f9d81e3b1021306b9dbdd041f.pdf
  47. Valdez, S. E. (2025). Project management plan for implementing a seawater filtration system in Belize Coast Guard forward operating bases (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad para la Cooperación Internacional).
  48. https://omeka.campusuci2.com/.../a6882e4f29c3ba490c4c169af50eab06.pdf
  49. Valdinoci, L. (2022). Evaluation of the sustainability level of a dairy and poultry farm: The response-inducing sustainability evaluation (RISE) method. https://amslaurea.unibo.it/id/eprint/26141
  50. Venkataraman, R. R., & Pinto, J. K. (2023). Cost and value management in projects. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?id=OemxEAAAQBAJ
  51. Wambua, S. M. (2023). Efficiency and competitiveness of chicken production in Machakos, Kiambu, and Uasin Gishu Counties, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, Kenyatta University). https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/26977
  52. Wambua, S., Murage, A., Wamae, L., Thuranira, E., Hong, S., & Kang, S. (2021). Enhancing household food and income security through improved indigenous poultry production: Evidence from Kenya. Journal of the Korean Society of International Agriculture, 33(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2021.33.2.170
  53. Weng, J. C. (2023). Putting intellectual robots to work: Implementing generative AI tools in project management. NYU SPS Applied Analytics Laboratory. http://hdl.handle.net/2451/69531
  54. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  55. Yaqin, H. N., Tjendani, H. T., & Witjaksana, B. (2023). Analysis of the acceleration of time and cost of implementing building construction projects using the critical path method (CPM). Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service, 4(2), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.36418/dev.v4i2.388
  56. Zhang, X., Denicol, J., Chan, P. W., & Le, Y. (2024). Designing the transition to operations in large inter-organizational projects: Strategy, structure, process, and people. Journal of Operations Management, 70(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1275