Influence of Performance Indicators on Acceptance of Performance Contracting among Secondary School Teachers in Kenya: A case of Meru Central District
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Measuring performance is a key strategy for organizational success. If performance of an employee is not quantified, one cannot be certain that there is any value gained from employee. Performance contracting is a concept that is used in Kenya to manage performance of employees. The contracting parties freely negotiate performance agreement which clearly specifies the intentions, obligations and responsibilities of the contracting parties. Performance contracts are gauged against an agreed set of indicators that provide a clear framework for establishing accountability. In Kenya it is a requirement for all civil servants to sign performance contracts. To date, the secondary school teachers have not yet fully accepted to sign performance contracts. The study, therefore, sort to establish the extent to which, performance indicators influence acceptance of performance contracting by secondary school teachers in Kenya, a case of Meru Central District. To achieve this objective, the study adopted descriptive research design. The study covered all the twenty one (21) public secondary schools in Meru Central District. The target population was all the government employed teachers within Meru Central District. A sample of thirty percent (30%) of teachers was picked from each of the 21 schools by use of simple random sampling. Primary data was collected by use of structured questionnaires and existing relevant documents were perused for secondary data. The data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. This was done by use of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Results were presented in charts, graphs and tables. The study findings indicated that performance indicators influenced acceptance of performance contracting by the secondary school teachers. The study concludes there is a positive relationship between performance indicators and acceptance of performance contracting by secondary school teachers.
Key Words: Performance Contracting, Performance indicators, Secondary Schools
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Ader, H.J., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Hand, D.J. (2008).Advising on research methods: A consultant‟s companion. Huizen, the Netherlands: Van Kessel.
- Armstrong, M.,& Baron, A. (2007).Managing performance: Performance management in Action.
- Chartered Institute of Personnel Development: London
- Armstrong, M. (2007) Strategic Human Resource Management. A guide to Action, Kogan Page: London.
- Billy, W., Edwin, O., Oscar, K., Lucas, O. (2010).Key Performance Indicators in Kenyan Hospitality
- Industry.A Managerial Perspective Benchmarking.An International Journal.Vol.17 No. 6. 2010
- Cheruiyot, K. (2008, May 28th). Teachers Union Rejects Performance Contracts. Kenyan Time
- Newspaper.pp 10
- Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS – ISBN 978-92-64- 05605-3 137 © OECD 2009
- Donald M. (2000). Major Problems in Performance Contractingfor Education. USA: Educational Technology Publications
- Education and Manpower Bureau (2003) Teacher Performance Management:
- https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/sch-admin/sbm/sbm-forms-references/staff-appraisal-system
- Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R., (2007).Educational research: An introduction.
- Boston: Pearson Education
- Githua, B. (2004 July21st).”Planning Instruction for Quality Assurance in Higher Education” A paper Presented to the Workshop on Planning Instructions of quality Assurance in Higher Education for School based Programmes, ARC Hotel, Egerton University, Njoro
- GoK (2010)-Review of performance contracting in the public sector, Nairobi: Government Printer. (Excerpts), September.
- Government of Kenya (2010), ICT Capacities in secondary schools in Kenya 2009/2010 MOEST no.046, National council for science and technology, Nairobi.
- Government of Kenya (GoK). (2007). Report on Evaluation of the Performance of Public Agencies. Nairobi: Government Printer.
- Governmnet of Kenya (GoK). (2009). Public Sector Reforms and Performance contracting, Sector Performance Standards Framework. Nairobi: Government Printers.
- Herman, A. (2009). Performance Management (2nded). River New Jersey: Pearson Education inc. Upper Saddle
- Hyndman, R.J. (2008). Stochastic population forecasts using functionsl data models for mortality, fertility and miogration. International journal of forecasting 24(3).323-342.
- Karsten, S., Vissccher, A. & De Jong, T. (2001), Another side to the coin: the unintended effect of the publication of school performance data in England and France, Comparativeeducation.
- Khim, O., Kelly, S., Yu. S., Wei, L. (2008).Teachers Appraisal and its Outcomes in Singapore Primary Schools.Nanyang Business School- Singapore Journal of education Adminstration vol. 46 no.1 pp 39-54
- Kobia, M.,& Mohammed, N. (2006).The Kenyan Experience with Performance Contract. Arusha AAPAM
- Lee, N. (2006).Measuring the performance of Public Sector Organization: A Case study on public schools in Malaysia” Measuring Business Excellence Journal of education Administration, vol.36 no.4 pp 50-64
- Marczyk, G., DeMatteo, D. & Festinger, D. (2005).Essentials of research design and Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Willey & Sons.
- Muthaura, F. (2007).Performance contracting in Kenya: restoring and building trust inGovernment through innovations to promote quality of public services.
- Nafukho, M., Kobia, M., & Huka, N. (2009).Performance Contracting and Human Performance Practice in Africa.Information Age Publishing.
- Ndirangu, M. and Oduto, M (2011). Quality of learning facilities and learning environment: Challenges for teaching and learning in Kenyans public universities. Journal of Quality Assurance in Education.Vol.19 No. 3, 2011.Pp 208-223.
- Nyamu, H. (2007). Teachers ‘Union got it all Wrong on Performance Contracts. Retrieved January 6, 20087.From ; htt://www.zbb.com/301.aspx?
- Odhiambo, O. (2003). Teachers Appraisal: The experience of Kenyan secondary school teachers. Journal of educational administration Vol.43 No.4 2007.Pp 402-416.
- Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development (OCED) (1997). In Search of results: Performance Management Practices in OECD Countries. Paris: Public Management Committee, OECD.
- Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development (OCED) (2007).Promoting the use of Performance-based contracts between water utilities & municipalities in EECCA; Case study number 1: Yerevan Water Supply company lease contract. Paris: Public Affairs Committee.
- Peterson, Richard A., (1982). Arts Audience Statistics & Culture indicators: A review of Compementary Approaches. National Endownment for the Arts, Washington DC.
- Richmond, V. (2010).Guideline for uniform performance standards and evaluation criteria for teachers.
- Virginia Department of education.
- Saitoti, G. (2003). Education sector review: “how far have we come since independence and what still needs to be done to meet educational needs of all Kenyans?” Report of the National Conference in education and training held at Kenyatta international conference centre Nairobi; 27th -29th Nov, pp 50-64
- Sinkovic, G., Currie.D.,& Bevanda,V. (2011). From IT to BSC: The importance of Culture in implementing a performance measurement system in Croatia India; a journal of Economic and Business, vol. 10, no. 1 March 2011, pp 39-55
- Performance Contract Steering Committee Kenya (2005). Sensitization, training Manual on Performance Contracts in the Public Service, Nairobi Kenya
- Waal de, A. (2008), “is performance management applicable in developing countries? The case of a Tanzania college” .International journal of emerging markets, vol. 2 no. 1, pp. 69-83
- Will, A. & Suzzane, S. (2008). The performance management handbook vol. 2.Establishing an integrated performance measurement system. California.
- World Bank, (2002) .Implementation of performance contract in Ghana. Washington DC
- Wragg, E. (2007). “Performance related pay: the views and experience of primary and secondaryhead teachers, Research paper in education. Vol. 54 no. 5/6 (2007) pp 468-481