Jesus’ teaching on the poor widow in Mark 12:41-44: Towards a contextual reading of the text in relation to the church’s teaching on giving

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 30, 2024
https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.8.II.246
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 8 No. II (2023): African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Okeno P. Akoth
St. Paul's University

Abstract

The poor widow in Mark 12:41-44 is praised for her generosity shown in contributing what she had to the Temple treasury. Because she contributes “out of her poverty”, she is actually more generous than all the rich people who contribute large sums out of their surplus. This seems to hold up the widow as an example of the true piety and generosity that exist among God’s people. However, the context of Mark 12:41- 44 raises the question whether the generosity of the poor widow should be taken as an occasion for praise as it has been traditionally held or for lament, as some scholars have suggested. When interpreted as cause for lament, the widow’s action would illustrate the perils of institutional religion whereby the Temple establishment manipulated this generous woman into parting with what little she possessed. This research has discussed the meaning of the poor widow’s story, by means of an exegetical analysis of the pericope and, subsequently, by the contextual reading of this pericope within its immediate narrative context, as well as in the broader context of the whole Markan narrative. The research has followed the steps of exegeting a biblical text such as historical approach, literary approach, text and translation, biblical and theological approach as well as application among others. The research has proposed a theological concept, “A concern for God’s Law on widows.” The argument has been that the poor widow should not be thought of as the exemplary giver.  Rather, she is more properly to be understood as the exemplary victim of a corrupt religious establishment. This research has established that Jesus’ words concerning the widow and her offering, is not a commendation, but is the crowning condemnation of the temple establishment.  Further, it has established the single sin of the scribes for which Jesus condemns them (Mark 12:40) and which is aggravated by their office as the official teachers of Israel’s religion. Their sin had a direct impact on the economic welfare of the widow in particular and the entire people in general. They compounded their sin of hypocrisy by actually overturning the Law of Moses, thus robbing those in society who were the most needy and vulnerable. On this understanding the research has shown that, the widow’s impoverished condition alone is a scandal in Israel in the light of Torah. But the circumstances of her poverty make the scandal far more grievous, for it has come at the hands of those who are teachers in Israel: the guardians of Torah and the true religion of Yahweh.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Akoth, O. P. . (2024). Jesus’ teaching on the poor widow in Mark 12:41-44: Towards a contextual reading of the text in relation to the church’s teaching on giving. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 8(II), 66–87. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.8.II.246

References

  1. Anderson, H. (1976). The Gospel of Mark. New Century Bible. London: Oliphants.
  2. Bayer, H.F. (2008). Das Evangelium des Markus. Historich-Theologische Auslegung. Giessen: Brunnen – Witten: Brockhaus.
  3. Boring, M.E. (2006). Mark. A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville, KY – London: Westminster John Knox.
  4. Brueggemann, Walter (1986). Hopeful Imagination: Prophetic voices in exile. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress press.
  5. Berkhof, Louis. (1915) Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans Sevensma Co.
  6. Blomberg, Craig L. (2007). The Historical Reliability of the Gospels, (2nd ed). Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Press.
  7. Blundell, Sue. (1995). Women in ancient Greece. London: British Museum Press.
  8. Blundell, Sue. (2001). Women in Ancient Greece: Sue Blundell. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
  9. Bovon, Francois and Helmut Koester. (2002). Luke 1: A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 1:1- 9:50. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
  10. Curtis, Edward L. “Some Features of Messianic Prophecy Illustrated by the Book of Joel.” The Old Testament Student 3, no. 5 (1884): 141-45. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3156452.
  11. Carson, D. A. et al. (1994) New Bible Commentary: 21st Century Edition. Inter-Varsity Press.
  12. Calvin, J. (1989) Harmony of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Grand Rapids: Baker.
  13. Cohen, C. (2007). Widow. Pages 40-42 in Encyclopaedia Judaica. (Second Edition. Vol. 21.) Edited by F. Skolnik. Detroit et al.: Thompson Gale.
  14. DiCicco, M. (1998). “What Can One Give in Exchange for One’s Life? A Narrative-Critical Study of the Widow and Her Offering, Mk 12:41-44.” In Currents in Theology and Missions 25:441-449.
  15. Derrett, J. D. M. (1972). Eating Up the Houses of Widows: Jesus’s Comment on Lawyers? Novum Testamentum 14:1-9.
  16. Donald Guthrie (1990). New Testament Introduction. Downers Grover, Illinois: Intervarsity Press.
  17. Donahue, J. R. and Harrington, D. J. (2002). The Gospel of Mark. Sacra Pagina 2. Collegeville,
  18. MN: Liturgical Press.
  19. Edwards, J. R. (2002). The Gospel According to Mark. The Pillar New Testament Commentary.
  20. Grand Rapids, MI/Cambridge, U.K.: Eerdmans; Leicester, U.K.: Apollos.
  21. Emil Schürer (1973), The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ (Revised and Edited by Geza Vermes et al) (Edinburgh: T&T Clark,), II 281
  22. Elizabeth Struthers Malbon, (1982) “The Poor Widow in Mark and Her Poor Rich Readers”,
  23. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 256-265
  24. Fitzmyer, J. A. (1985). The Gospel according to Luke. Introduction, Translation, and Notes. AncB 28A. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  25. Fleddermann, H. (1982). A Warning about the Scribes (Mark 12:37b-40). Catholic Biblical Quarterly 44:52-67.
  26. France, R.T. (2002). The Gospel of Mark. A Commentary on the Greek Text. The New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans.
  27. Finley, M. I. (1982). Economy and society in ancient Greece. New York: Viking.
  28. Friberg, Timothy, Barbara Friberg and Neva F. Miller. (2000), Analytical Lexicon of the Greek New Testament, Baker's Greek New Testament library (vol.4). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.
  29. France, R. T. (2002). The Gospel of Mark. A Commentary on the Greek Text. The New International Gardner, Jane F. (2016) Women in Roman Law and Society. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Pr, 1986. Routledge.
  30. Goodspeed, Edgar J. (1937). Introduction to the New Testament. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
  31. Gregory, D. S. (1877). Why Four Gospels? Or, The Gospel for All the World. New York: Sheldon and Company.
  32. Gundry, Robert H. (1981). A Survey of the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.
  33. Geldenhuys, Norval. (1977). Commentary on the Gospel of Luke: The English Text With Introduction, Exposition and Notes, The New International Commentary on the Old and New Testament .Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
  34. Green, Joel B. (1997). The Gospel of Luke, The New International Commentary on the New Testament.Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
  35. Grenz, Stanley, and Denise Muir Kjesbo. (1995). Women in the Church: A Biblical Theology of Women in Ministry. Downers Grove, Ill: Inter Varsity Press.
  36. Groothuis, Rebecca Merrill. (1997). Good News for Women: A Biblical Picture of Gender Equality. Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Books.
  37. Guttentag, M., and P. E. Secord. (1983). Too many women? The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  38. Howard. Marshall, I. (2004). New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel. Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press.
  39. Hughes, R. Kent. (1989). Mark: Volume 1 Jesus, Servant and Saviour, in Preaching the Word.
  40. Wheaton Illinois: Crossway Books.
  41. Hubbard, Robert L. (1988). The Book of Ruth, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
  42. Hurley, James B. (2002). Man and Woman in Biblical Perspective. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Pub.
  43. Hagner, Donald A. (2002). Word Biblical Commentary: Matthew 14-28, (vol.33B). Word Biblical Commentary. Dallas: Word, Incorporated.
  44. Johnson A. Elizabeth. (1993) “Redeeming the Name of Christ,” Freeing Theology. San Francisco: Harper.
  45. Kithinji Julias. (2021). Absolute Authority in Mark’s Gospel: A postcolonial analysis of power abuse in Kenya. U.S.A. Borderless Press.
  46. LaVerdiere, E. (1999). The Beginning of the Gospel. Introducing the Gospel According to Mark.
  47. Vol. 2. Collegeville, MI: Liturgical Press.
  48. Marshall, Howard I. (1978). The Gospel of Luke: A Commentary on the Greek Text, The New international Greek testament commentary. Exeter [Eng.: Paternoster Press.
  49. Mays, James Luther. (1996). Publishers Harper & Row and Society of Biblical Literature, Harper's Bible Commentary. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
  50. McCabe, Elizabeth A. (2011). Women in the Biblical World. A Survey of Old and New Testament Perspectives. Volume 1. Lanham, Md: University Press of America.
  51. Mickelsen, Alvera, Patricia Gundry, and James I. Packer. Women, Authority & the Bible [the Essays and Responses Here Were Selected from Among Those Presented at the Evangelical Colloqium on Women and the Bible Held October 9 - 11, 1984, in Oak Brook, Illinois]. Downers Grove, Ill: InterVarsity Pr, 1986.
  52. Morris, Leon. (1995). The Gospel According to John, The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
  53. Mills, Watson E., and Roger Aubrey Bullard. (1997). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Macon, Ga: Mercer University Press.Okland, Jorunn. (2004). Women in Their Place: Paul and the Corinthian Discourse of Gender and Sanctuary Space. London: Clark.
  54. Mann, C.S. (1986). Mark. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AncB 27.
  55. Malbon, E.S. (1991). The Poor Widow in Mark and Her Poor Rich Readers. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 53:589-604.
  56. Malbon, E.S. (1989). The Jewish Leaders in the Gospel of Mark: A Literary Study of Marcan Characterization. Journal of Biblical Literature 108:259-281.
  57. Maybee, Julie E. (2019 ) “Hegel’s Exploratory”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.),URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/hegel- dialectics/
  58. Neville, D. J., (2008). Dialectic as Method in Public Theology: Recalling Jacques Ellul.
  59. International Journal of Public Theology, pp 163–181. Available at: www.brill.nl/ijpt
  60. Oden, T.C. and Hall, C.A. (1998). Mark (Revised). Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture
  61. NT 2. Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity.
  62. Philip Schaff, (1955). History of the Christian Church: Apostolic Christianity A.D. 1-100. (vol. 1).
  63. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
  64. Porter, Stanley E. (1995). “Literary Approaches to the New Testament: From Formalism to Deconstruction and Back.” In Approaches to New Testament Studies. Eds. Stanley E. Porter and David Tombs. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
  65. Parker, Joy, "A unified vision: hermeneutics of hunger and feminist ethics of care as means for approaching international relations, with an examination of u.s. political involvement in liberia" (2015). Masters Essays. 22. http://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays/22
  66. Reid, Barbara E. (1996). Choosing the Better Part? Women in the Gospel of Luke. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.
  67. Resner, André, Jr. (2003) "Reading the text for economic justice: Mark 12:38-44 for stewardship season." Living Pulpit 12, no. 2 (April 1, 2003): 6-7.
  68. Robertson, A. T. (1985). A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research. New York: Hodder and Stoughton, n.d.
  69. Schaff, Philip. (1955). History of the Christian Church, 3rd edition, 8 vol. Grand Rapids, Michigan:Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
  70. Scalise, Pamela J. (1986). “Women in Ministry: Reclaiming Our Old Testament Heritage.”
  71. Review and Expositor. 83, no. 1:7-13.
  72. Seim, Turid Karlsen. (2004). The Double Message : Patterns of Gender in Luke-Acts. London; New York: T&T Clark.
  73. Spencer, F. Scott. (2013). Salty Wives, Spirited Mothers, and Savvy Widows: Capable Women of Purpose and Persistence in Luke's Gospel. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
  74. Stark, Rodney. “Reconstructing the Rise of Christianity: The Role of Women.” Sociology of Religion 56, no. 3 (1995): 229-44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3711820.
  75. Streete, Gail Corrington. (1997). The Strange Woman: Power and Sex in the Bible. Louisville, Ky: Westminster John Knox Press.
  76. Sampley, J. Paul. (2003). Paul in the Greco-Roman World: A Handbook. 2003.
  77. Smith, G. (1997). “A Closer Look at the Widow’s offering: Mark 12:41-44.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 40:27-36.
  78. Sugirtharajah, R. S. (1991) “The Widow's Mites Revalued”, Expository Times 103: 42-43
  79. Schürer, E. and Vermes, G. and Millar, F. and Black, M. (1979) The History of the Jewish People
  80. in the Age of Jesus Christ (175 B.C. – A.D. 135). Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
  81. Smith, G. (1997). “A Closer Look at the Widow’s offering: Mark 12:41-44.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 40:27-36.
  82. Swartley M. Willard. (1997) “The Role of Women in Mark’s Gospel: A Narrative analysis.” BTB.
  83. Taylor, V. (1966). The Gospel According to St. Mark. The Greek Text with Introduction, Notes,
  84. and Indexes. London: Macmillan – New York, NY: St. Martinʼs Press.
  85. Westcott, Brooke Foss. (1875). A General Survey of the History of the Canon of the New Testament, (fourth edition.) London: Macmillan and Co.
  86. Westcott, Brooke Foss. (1875). An Introduction to the Study of the Gospels. London: MacMillan and Co.
  87. Williams, J. F. (1994). Other Followers of Jesus. Minor Characters as Major Figures in Mark’s Gospel. JSNT.S 102. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
  88. Wright, A. G. (1982). The Widow’s Mites: Praise or Lament? – A Matter of Context. Catholic Biblical Quarterly 44:256-265.
  89. Witherington III, B. (2001). The Gospel of Mark. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, U.K.: Eerdmans.
  90. Wallace, D.B. (1996). Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
  91. Yonge. C. D. (1854). The Works of Philo Judaeus, the Contemporary of Josephus, (vol. 1.)
  92. London: Henry G. Bohn.
  93. Youngblood, Ronald F., Herbert Lockyer, Sr., F. F. Bruce, and R. K. Harrison, eds. (1995). Nelson's New Illustrated Bible Dictionary, rev. ed. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers. Logos.
  94. Bible Commentaries
  95. Aquinas, Thomas. Catena Aurea: Commentary on the Four Gospels, Collected out of the Works of the Fathers, 4 vols. Oxford: John Henry, c1841-45.
  96. Barnes, Albert. Notes Explanatory and Practical, on the Gospels, (2 vols.) New York: Harper and Brothers, 1852-53.
  97. Bickersteth, Edward, and John Radford Thomson. St. Mark. In The Pulpit Commentary. Eds. H.
  98. D. M. Spence and Joseph Exell. New York; Toronto: Funk & Wagnalls Company, n.d.
  99. Calvin, John (1845). Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists, Matthew, Mark, Luke, (3 vols.) Trans. William Pringle. Edinburgh: The Calvin Translation Society.
  100. Chadwick, G. A. The Gospel According to St. Mark. In The Expositor’s Bible. Ed. William R. Nicoll. New York: Hodder & Stoughton, n.d.
  101. Exell, Joseph (1905). Matthew. In The Biblical Illustrator. New York; Chicago; Toronto: Fleming
  102. H. Revell Company.
  103. Gill, John. (1811). An Exposition of the New Testament, (3 vols.) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: William W. Woodward.
  104. Gould, Ezra P (1896). A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. Mark. In The International Critical Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. Eds. Charles A. Briggs, Samuel R. Driver, and Alfred Plummer. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  105. Gundry, Robert H.(1993) Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.
  106. Hooker, Morna D. (1991). The Gospel according to Saint Mark. In Black’s New Testament Commentary. London: Continuum. Logos.
  107. Lane, William L.(194). The Gospel of Mark. In The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. Logos.
  108. Dissertations and Research Papers
  109. Bain, Bruce Alan. “Literary Surface Structures in Mark: Identifying Christology as the Purpose of the Gospel.” PhD diss., Fuller Theological Seminary, 1997 [on-line]. Accessed 29 August 2013. Available from http://search.proquest.com.aaron.swbts.edu/pqdthss/docview/304487757/1402E6CEA424 2E4E21D/1?accountid=7073,
  110. Internet
  111. Keating, Corey. “The Criteria Used for Developing the New Testament Canon in the First Four Centuries of the Christian Church.” Research Paper, Fuller Theological Seminary, 2000 [on-line]. Accessed 15 April 2012. Available from http://www.ntgreek.org/SeminaryPapers/ChurchHistory/Criteria%20for%20Development
  112. %20of%20the%20NT%20Canon%20in%20First%20Four%20Centuries.pdf, [accessed Nov 24 2020]
  113. Understanding triangulation in research. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255952608_Understanding_triangulation_in_re search, [accessed Aug 23 2021].
  114. Internet Documentation
  115. The Anti-Marcionite Prologues to the Gospels. Trans. Roger Pearse (2006) [on-line]. Accessed 16 April 2010. Available from http://www.ccel.org/ccel/pearse/morefathers/files/anti_marcionite_prologues.htm, Internet.
  116. Carl, Stephen C. “Hypotyposeis: Sketches in Biblical Studies.” [on-line]. Accessed 14 March 2010. Available at http://www.hypotyposeis.org/weblog/2004/02/kelhoffers-article-on- eusebius-and.html,
  117. Constable, Thomas L. Notes on Mark. Garland, Texas: Sonic Light, 2008 [on-line]. Accessed 28 December 2008. Available from http://www.soniclight.com/constable/notes.htm; Internet, 4.
  118. Ezell, Douglas. “Gospel According to Mark.” [on-line]. Accessed 14 March 2010. Available from http://mbsoft.com/believe/txs/mark.htm; Internet.
  119. Wallace, Daniel B. “Mark: Introduction, Argument, and Outline”. In Biblical Studies Foundation. Richardson, Texas: Biblical Studies Press, 1998. [on-line]; Accessed 6 July 2010; available from http://bible.org/seriespage/luke-introduction-argument-and outline, Internet.
  120. Class Notes
  121. wa Gatumu, Kabiro. (2020) “Class Notes.” In TBS 210E: New Testament Greek Exegesis 1.
  122. Limuru: St. Paul’s University, Faculty of Theology.