The Influence of Stakeholder Feedback on Image Management of Organizations: A Case Study of the Nakuru County Government
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
In contemporary organizational environments, stakeholder feedback has become indispensable to effective image and reputation management. This study aimed at identifying and categorizing distinct forms of stakeholder input used by the Nakuru County Government in its image management efforts, evaluating the degree of integration of stakeholder input in the Nakuru County Government’s image management strategies and assessing the correlation between stakeholder feedback trends and public perception of the Nakuru County Government’s image for the past five years. The study was anchored on the public relations theory. The study adopted mixed research design. The research targeted a variety of stakeholder from Nakuru County Government. Stratified Random Sampling and purposive sampling were used. The sample size was 157 respondents. A sample size of 12 key informants who included 6 internal stakeholders (County officials), 6 external stakeholders was also used. There was 1 FGDs involving the three groups of stakeholders. Each group had a total number of ten respondents. Data was collected using questionnaires, interviews and focused group discussions. Quantitative data from questionnaires were analyzed using statistical software using descriptive analysis to get the percentages and frequencies. Qualitative data collected from interviews and focus group discussions was transcribed and analyzed thematically. Results showed that 51.2% of the respondents rated the current image of the Nakuru County Government among the public as fair while 24.4% rated it as good. Further, 75.6% of the respondents indicated that stakeholder feedback has improved the County Government’s image significantly. The study concludes that Nakuru County’s public image is moderately positive, with improvements in services. To enhance perception, it should strengthen responsiveness, transparency, and communication. Implementing structured feedback systems, equitable community engagement, and performance indicators will boost accountability and trust, ensuring inclusive development and a consistently credible public image.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Ackah, S., & Bimpong, S. (2024). Stakeholder participation and communication strategies in public institutions: Lessons from the Ghana Highway Authority. Journal of Public Relations and Governance, 18(2), 112–129.
- African Union. (2025). African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM) 2025 Report on Governance Reforms. African Union Commission.
- Ati, A., Satpathy, A., & Saxena, R. (2024). Trust in local public service managers and citizen participation: Evidence from Visakhapatnam, India. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(1), 45–62.
- Bowen, S. A. (2009). A standards model for public relations: Public approval of corporate behavior. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 1–28.
- Chebore, L. (2015). Inclusive governance through public participation: A case study of Nakuru County. University of Nairobi Repository.
- Dalton, R. J. (2020). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (7th ed.). CQ Press.
- de Graaf, G., & Van Asperen, H. (2022). Transparency in public administration: Creating clarity in a confusing conceptual landscape. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 12–23.
- Edwards, L. (2018). Understanding public relations: Theory, culture and society (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Emeka-Okoli, N., Adebayo, K., & Obasi, A. (2024). Dialogue and stakeholder storytelling: Building organizational legitimacy in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(1), 56–73.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
- Fu, P. P., Cooper, T. L., Woo, C., & Kwestel, E. (2024). Organizational listening and inclusive engagement: Foundations for participatory governance. Governance and Public Management Review, 30(2), 67–89.
- Fung, A. (2021). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton University Press.
- Grunig, J. E. (2013). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Routledge.
- Grunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A., & Dozier, D. M. (1995). Manager's guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Gutheil, R. (2023). Stakeholder feedback and public trust in sub-national governance: A case study of Nakuru County, Kenya. African Journal of Governance and Development, 11(4), 221–240.
- Kariuki, J. (2022). Urban planning and public engagement in Nakuru City: Stakeholder participation and governance implications. Journal of African Urban Studies, 6(3), 98–117.
- Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2021). Citizen participation, transparency, and trust in government: A comparative analysis. Public Management Review, 23(2), 234–251.
- Kivandi, D., & Muna, W. (2020). Stakeholder communication and image management in county governments: Evidence from Kenya. African Journal of Public Affairs, 10(2), 77–92.
- Kivandi, M. (2020). Digital transformation and citizen participation in devolved governments: The Nakuru County case. Kenya School of Government Policy Briefs, 3(1), 34–48.
- Kivandi, M., & Muna, C. (2020). Social media and citizen engagement in county governance: Trends from Nakuru County. Journal of e-Government Studies, 4(2), 77–89.
- Lee, G., & Park, S. (2023). Public trust in government and citizen engagement in the digital era. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101712.
- Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2011). A stakeholder model for implementing social responsibility in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 45(9/10), 1400–1419.
- Malusha, D. (2023). Public participation and budgeting in county governments: Case study of Nakuru County. Institute of Public Finance Kenya Working Papers, 12(1), 15–32.
- Mary, T. (2024). Maternal health outcomes and data-driven governance: The impact of stakeholder feedback in Nakuru County. East African Medical Journal, 101(2), 89–97.
- Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2021). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101938.
- Miniti, J., & Moronge, M. (2018). Influence of project management practices on implementation of county government projects: A case of Nakuru County, Kenya. International Journal of Project Management, 2(1), 1–18.
- Mutua, J., & Wekesa, S. (2020). Effectiveness of structured feedback tools in public service delivery: Evidence from Kenyan counties. Public Policy and Administration Review, 8(4), 103–118.
- Mwanzia, K., & Kimathi, T. (2021). The role of traditional forums in modern governance: A study of public barazas in Kenya. African Journal of Governance and Development, 10(1), 55–70.
- OECD. (2024). Trust in government: Building effective and inclusive institutions. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/governance/trust-in-government/
- OECD. (2025). Civic tech and participatory governance in Africa: Case studies from Kenya and South Africa. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- Omondi, J. A. (2018). Governance and service delivery in Kenya’s county governments. International Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 4(1), 45–59.
- Omwenga, B. (2023). Strategic planning and implementation in Kenyan devolved units. Kenya Journal of Management and Policy Studies, 5(1), 66–78.
- Schubert, C., & van den Broek, T. (2022). Transparency and trust in public institutions: The role of information visibility. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(3), 444–460.
- Tench, R., Verčič, D., Zerfass, A., Moreno, Á., & Verhoeven, P. (2021). Communication excellence: How to develop, manage, and lead exceptional communications. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Waikenda, M. (2019). Stakeholder participation and performance of county governments in Kenya. Public Policy and Administration Research, 9(4), 55–63.
- Waddington, S. (2012). What's next for public relations? Reflections on Grunig and Hunt’s four models in the digital age. Journal of Communication Management, 16(4), 362–370.