Imago Dei and Artificial Creation: An Old Testament Theology of Humanity from Genesis 1: 26–27 and Psalm 8 for Sustainable Development
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) and biotechnological systems increasingly reshape human experience, social relationships, and institutional structures, faith communities are called to articulate robust theological frameworks that affirm human dignity and guide ethical innovation. While contemporary AI ethics often prioritize efficiency, autonomy, and technological advancement, they frequently overlook the deeper insights of theological anthropology, particularly the Old Testament’s vision of personhood grounded in covenant, vocation, and divine image-bearing. This study addressed that gap by examining how the biblical concept of imago Dei can inform ethical discernment and theological reflection in the age of machine intelligence. The research focused on Genesis 1:26–27 and Psalm 8, employing historical-critical and canonical approaches to trace their original meaning and ongoing theological trajectory. Genesis 1 was interpreted as a foundational theological text that defines human identity through divine image-bearing, relational stewardship, and moral vocation under God’s sovereignty. Psalm 8 was analyzed as a poetic and liturgical affirmation of humanity’s covenantal dignity and delegated authority within creation. Together, these texts construct a biblical anthropology emphasizing relational dependence on God and moral responsibility toward creation. Engaging these biblical perspectives with contemporary debates on AI and biotechnology, the study explored their ethical relevance to justice, equity, and sustainability, particularly in light of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 3, 9, 10, and 16). The research argues that the Old Testament offers a distinct theological vision of humanity defined not by technological capacity but by divine calling and relational accountability. This vision provides practical ethical tools, stewardship, justice, and communal responsibility that can guide churches, scholars, and policymakers in assessing the use and moral boundaries of AI and biotechnology. Incorporating African contextual theology, the study applies biblical anthropology to concerns of technological inequality, cultural autonomy, and sustainable human flourishing. Ultimately, it proposes a faith-rooted ethical framework for navigating the theological and moral implications of artificial creation.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
- Bediako, K. (2004). Theology and identity: The impact of culture upon Christian thought in the second century and in modern Africa. Oxford, UK: Regnum Books.
- Behrens, J. (2020). Ethics and emerging technologies: A theological approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Brueggemann, W. (1982). Genesis: Interpretation: A Bible commentary for teaching and preaching. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
- Childs, B. S. (1985). Introduction to the Old Testament as Scripture. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
- Clines, D. J. A. (1997). ‘The image of God in man’, in Ryken, L., Wilhoit, J. C. and Longman III, T. (eds.) Dictionary of Biblical Imagery. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, pp. 210–217.
- Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI ethics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Gunton, C. (2002). The Christian Faith: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine. London: T & T Clark.
- Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., & Vayena, E. (2018). ‘AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations’, Minds and Machines, 28(4), pp. 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
- Gathogo, J. (2008). ‘African philosophy as expressed in the concepts of hospitality and ubuntu’, Journal of Theology for Southern Africa, 130, pp. 39–53.
- Goswami, S. (2019). ‘AI ethics and Christian anthropology: A critical review’, Journal of Technology and Religion, 8(2), pp. 110–125.
- Haker, H. (2018). ‘The ethics of AI and robotics from a theological and ethical perspective’, in Wildman, K. W. (ed.) Science and Religion: One World – Changing Perspectives on Reality. London: Routledge, pp. 129–139.
- Köhler, G. (2015). The Psalms and Their Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
- Marshall, K. (2018). Faith and development: Rethinking the role of religion in global affairs. Washington, DC: World Faiths Development Dialogue.
- Mbiti, J. S. (1990). African religions and philosophy. Nairobi, Kenya: Heinemann.
- Middleton, J. R. (2005). The Liberating Image: The Imago Dei in Genesis 1. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press.
- Miller, T. R. (2021). Technology and ethics in the 21st century. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Peters, T. (2020). Playing God? Genetic determinism and human freedom. London, UK: Routledge.
- Schaefer, J. (2018). ‘Faith and technology: Theological reflections on AI’, Journal of Religious Ethics, 46(2), pp. 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12221
- Tanner, K. (2019). Christianity and the new spirit of capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. London, UK: Rider.
- Ukpong, J. S. (2014). ‘Technology, culture, and African theology’, African Journal of Theology, 53(1), pp. 140–155.
- United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Human development report 2023: Breaking the gridlock. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org
- Waltke, B. K. (2001). Genesis: A Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
- Ziai, A. (2016). ‘Development discourse and global history: From colonialism to the Sustainable Development Goals’, Forum for Development Studies, 43(3), pp. 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2016.1227870