Harmonizing Innovation and Ethics: An Exploration of AI-Driven Public Relations Practice at Daystar University, Kenya

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr. Anne Anjao Eboi
Josephine Otiende

Abstract

Research indicates that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is here to stay, with a blend of AI and human insight. AI is revolutionizing how organizations in Kenya engage with their audiences, offering tools for enhanced personalization, sentiment analysis, real-time responsiveness, and data-driven decision-making. However, this technological shift presents a critical challenge: maintaining engagement and authenticity. AI use raises pertinent ethical issues, including chatbots, disclosure of AI use in content creation, misinformation, algorithmic bias, privacy concerns, transparency, disinformation, and information security, all of which can erode trust between the organization and its publics. Guided by utilitarianism, this qualitative study explored the use of AI in the Public Relations Department at Daystar University (DU), one of Kenya’s leading universities. Using a qualitative exploratory research design, the study conducted in-depth interviews with five purposively sampled professionals in the Corporate Affairs Department, where Public Relations is housed, and analyzed the data using content analysis. Qualitative content analysis of a chatbot was also conducted. Findings revealed that the DU PR department staff use AI tools individually, as no ethical framework exists to support the official use of AI. Tools include engagement, content creation, email-related, chatbots, and meeting management tools. The staff derives benefits like refined writing, better event coordination, and easier stakeholder engagement, among others. However, ethical challenges exist, such as plagiarism, misinformation, unsupported ideas, a lack of a human interface, and bias. Because AI offers many significant benefits, it is imperative that PR units develop ethical frameworks and organize training for their employees.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Harmonizing Innovation and Ethics: An Exploration of AI-Driven Public Relations Practice at Daystar University, Kenya. (2026). African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 11(1), 659-680. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.11.1.2026.554

How to Cite

Harmonizing Innovation and Ethics: An Exploration of AI-Driven Public Relations Practice at Daystar University, Kenya. (2026). African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, 11(1), 659-680. https://doi.org/10.71064/spu.amjr.11.1.2026.554

References

  1. Abumere, F. A. (2019). Utilitarianism. In ‘Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics.’
  2. https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-ethics/chapter/utilitarianism/
  3. Adu, J. A. (2024). The Diffusion and Reinvention of Information and Communication Technology in Africa: An Exploratory Study of Artificial Intelligence in Ghana and Kenya (Doctoral dissertation). https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/items/b3a3f677-71bf-4e62-87d4-d62ad274b1d7
  4. Alves, M., Seringa, J., Silvestre, T. et al. Use of Artificial Intelligence tools in supporting
  5. decision-making in hospital management. BMC Health Serv Res 24, 1282 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11602-y
  6. Anani-Bossman, A., Nutsugah, N., & Abudulai, J. I. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Public
  7. Relations and communication management: Perspectives of Ghanaian professionals. Journal for Communication Studies in Africa, 43(1), 3-13. https://journals.uj.ac.za/index.php/jcsa/article/view/2506
  8. Bourne, C., & Jackson, M. (2025). AI Ethics are not enough: Public Relations, Social Justice, and Artificial Intelligence, in (Eds. Edward et al). The Sage Handbook of Promotional Culture and Society. https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=egAVEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA59&dq=Ethics+and+AI+in+public+relations+in+AFrica&ots=Mz5jr1USXD&sig=pTvk2JjLMYlnTllAwAEeNkTz_2U&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  9. Bekele, W. B., & Ago, F. Y. (2022). Sample size for an interview in qualitative research in social
  10. Sciences: A guide to novice researchers. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 4(1), 42-50.
  11. Bourne, C. (2019). AI cheerleaders: Public relations, neoliberalism and artificial intelligence. Public Relations Inquiry, 8(2), 109–125. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2046147X19835250
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (4th ed.). Sage.
  13. Eke, C., & Adeyemi, M. O. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance Public Relations strategies for Nigeria's economic recovery in the 21st century. A Journal of Contemporary Research, 21(3): 2-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384171492_LEVERAGING_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_FOR_ENHANCEMENT_OF_PUBLIC_RELATIONS_STRATEGIES_IN_NIGERIAN_ECONOMIC_RECOVERY_IN_21ST_CENTURY
  14. Ewing, M. (2023). AI-driven public relations: Enhancing audience targeting and engagement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 35(2), 123–145.
  15. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82.
  16. Haydon, G., Riet, P.V.D. (2014). A narrative inquiry: How do nurses respond to patients’ use of humour? Contemporary Nurse. 46(2): 197-205.
  17. Jeong, J., & Park, N. (2023). Examining the influence of artificial intelligence on public relations:
  18. Insights from the organization-situation-public-communication (OSPC) model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange, 9(7), 485-495.
  19. Karanja, J. M. (2025). Beyond awareness: Exploring AI’s impact on Kenyan PR adoption,
  20. efficiency, and ethics, in Emma L., & Orru, P. (Eds), in Artificial Intelligence and Human Perception: Media Discourse and Public Opinion. https://iris.unica.it/retrieve/d72e331b-4104-4568-af6a-59041c4f19c6/2025_Rombi_Threat%20or%20Benefit%20Unveiling%20the%20Political%20and%20Personal%20Factors%20behind%20Italians%20perception%20of%20AI.pdf#page=130
  21. Katsikeas, C., Viglia, G., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence, stakeholder
  22. engagement, and innovation value. Journal of Product Innovation Management. Call for Papers.
  23. Knuuttila, A. (2024). The potential benefits and challenges of adopting AI tools such as ChatGPT in marketing communications and search engine optimization. Master’s Thesis.
  24. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/853453/Knuuttila_Anni.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
  25. Kumar, A.; Bapat, G.; Kumar, A.; Hota, S.L.; Abishek, G.D.; Vaz, S. Unlocking brand excellence: Harnessing AI tools for enhanced customer engagement and innovation. Eng. Proc. 2023, 59, 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ engproc2023059204
  26. Leo, I. J., Madu, N., Ezenwa, L., Ramkissoon, L., Adebayo, P., Mugume, T., & Nalwooga, S. (2026). AI ethical policy in Africa. Digit. Gov. Res. (7) 1, 1-4. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3776546
  27. Luca, C. (2023). AI-driven predictive analytics and real-time decisioning in customer service.
  28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388909424_AI-Driven_Predictive_Analytics_and_Real-Time_Decisioning_in_Customer_Service
  29. Mazingue, C. (2023). Perceived challenges and benefits of AI implementation in customer
  30. relationship management systems. Journal of Digitovation and Information System, 3(1), 72 –. https://doi.org/10.54433/JDIIS.2023100023
  31. McGee, R. (2024). How ethical is utilitarian ethics? A study in artificial intelligence. Working
  32. Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4731871
  33. Mill, J. S. (2016). Utilitarianism. In Seven masterpieces of philosophy (pp. 329–375). Routledge.
  34. Moen, T. (2006). Reflections on the narrative research approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4): 56–69. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/160940690600500405
  35. Muurlink, O., & Thomsen, B. (2024). Qualitative research approaches to social
  36. phenomena. Advanced research methods for applied psychology, 99-110.
  37. https://acquire.cqu.edu.au/articles/chapter/Qualitative_research_approaches_to_social_phenomena/27092014
  38. Nkembuh, N. (2024). Beyond algorithms: A comprehensive analysis of AI-driven
  39. personalization in strategic communications. Journal of Computer and Communications, 12, 112-131. doi: 10.4236/jcc.2024.1210009.
  40. Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples
  41. and application in qualitative research studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5, 90-99.
  42. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419
  43. Oduenyi, C. C., & Williams, E. E. (2024). An assessment of artificial intelligence integration in
  44. the practice of public relations in Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 11(2), 35-37. https://j.arabianjbmr.com/index.php/ocAJBMR/article/view/1237
  45. Rane, N. L., Desai, P., Rane, J., & Mallick, S. K. (2024). Using artificial intelligence, machine
  46. learning, and deep learning for sentiment analysis in customer relationship management to improve customer experience, loyalty, and satisfaction. In Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Industry and Society (pp. 233-261). Deep Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.70593/978 81-981367-4-9_7
  47. Renckens, M. (2023). The power and purpose of AI in media relations.
  48. https://www.prsa.org/article/the-power-and-purpose-of-ai-in-media-relations
  49. Roff, H. M. (2020). Expected utilitarianism. Computers and Society.
  50. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07321
  51. Singh, K. (2026). The role of AI in Public Relations. Search Compendium.
  52. https://searchcompendium.com/ai-in-public-relations/
  53. Stryker, C. & Kavlakoglu, E. (n.d.). What is AI? IBM.
  54. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/artificial-intelligence
  55. Tajik,O. , Golzar,J. and Noor, S. (2025). Purposive sampling. International Journal of Education
  56. & Language Studies, (3), 1-9. doi: 10.22034/ijels.2025.490681.1029
  57. Ve Halkla İlişkiler, Y, Z. & Ve Zararlar, P. F. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in public relations:
  58. Potential Benefits and Drawbacks. Yeni Medya Dergisi.
  59. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3712378#:~:text=Artificial%20intelligence%20has%20the%20potential,propaganda%20and%20to%20spread%20disinformation
  60. Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (n.d.). Qualitative analysis of content.
  61. https://pages.ischool.utexas.edu/yanz/Content_analysis.pdf